Pre-apocalyptische notas over nothing. Sciency stuff, poetry, politics, art and the music of total dissent. May the Almighty bless you and all who sail into her... Welcome to my cave
All good points, if fairness and justice are the end sought. But the partition of British Palestine was never intended to be one of fairness and/ or justice. It was always Europe's guilt-gift to the Jews post WWII for the holocaust. One sustained through European guilt-pride even today.
It's the same attitude as many Americans have for DEI and Affirmative Action. It's not a question of fairness and justice, but guilt-pride for historical slavery. It's an "eternal debt" that must be repaid, but can never be repaid. It's symbolic and "eternal".
–Hannah Ardent, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”
Hannah was a Jew. She makes the rational case against guilt-pride, but rationality isn't the issue. Guilt-pride is irrational. It's part of one of the Rene Girardian mimetic theory/ Carl Schmitt enemy mythos that underpin group social cohesion. Both Arab and Jewish. It can't be broken, because in BOTH religions the enemy/ scapegoat is ALWAYS guilty (never innocent, as in Christianity).
It's the rare individual (like the guy in your video) that can make the leap and see the social group's scapegoat as innocent.
Top left: The Heart Sec. right: Attraction I Third left: The Brooch Fourth right: Madonna From the book: Edvard Munch - In Di...
All good points, if fairness and justice are the end sought. But the partition of British Palestine was never intended to be one of fairness and/ or justice. It was always Europe's guilt-gift to the Jews post WWII for the holocaust. One sustained through European guilt-pride even today.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenIt's the same attitude as many Americans have for DEI and Affirmative Action. It's not a question of fairness and justice, but guilt-pride for historical slavery. It's an "eternal debt" that must be repaid, but can never be repaid. It's symbolic and "eternal".
BeantwoordenVerwijderen–Hannah Ardent, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
BeantwoordenVerwijderen“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”
Hannah was a Jew. She makes the rational case against guilt-pride, but rationality isn't the issue. Guilt-pride is irrational. It's part of one of the Rene Girardian mimetic theory/ Carl Schmitt enemy mythos that underpin group social cohesion. Both Arab and Jewish. It can't be broken, because in BOTH religions the enemy/ scapegoat is ALWAYS guilty (never innocent, as in Christianity).
It's the rare individual (like the guy in your video) that can make the leap and see the social group's scapegoat as innocent.
Thanks, no beef with any of thar, FarMaga.
BeantwoordenVerwijderen